The 3-0 ruling by the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals gives the US Supreme Court a chance to rule on the law, which conservatives and commentators right-wingers said it was necessary to prevent “Big Tech” from suppressing their views.
“Today, we reject the idea that corporations have the right to freely censor what people say,” Judge Andrew Oldham, appointed by former President Donald Trump, wrote in the ruling.
The Texas law was passed by the state’s Republican-led legislature and signed by its Republican governor.
Tech groups that challenged the law and were losers in Friday’s ruling include NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association, which count Objective platforms’ Facebook, Twitter and Alphabet Inc’s YouTube as members.
They have sought to preserve users’ right to regulate content where they believe it may lead to violence, citing concerns that unregulated platforms will allow extremists such as Nazi supporters, terrorists and governments hostile strangers.
Discover the stories that interest you
The association said on Friday it disagreed with requiring private companies to give equal treatment in all respects. “‘God Bless America’ and ‘Death to America’ are two points of view, and it is reckless and unconstitutional for the State of Texas to compel a private company to treat them the same,” he said. said in a statement.
Some conservatives have called the social media companies’ practices abusive, pointing to Twitter’s permanent suspension of Trump from the platform soon after Jan. 1. 6, 2021, attack on the United States Capitol by a mob of his supporters. Twitter had cited “the risk of further incitement to violence” as the reason.
Texas law prohibits social media companies with at least 50 million monthly active users from acting to “censor” users based on their “viewpoint” and allows users or the Texas Attorney General to take legal action to enforce the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Twitter hailed the decision as “a massive victory for the constitution and free speech.”
Because the 5th Circuit ruling conflicts with part of an 11th Circuit ruling, aggrieved parties have a stronger case to ask the Supreme Court to hear the case.
In May, the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit found that most similar Florida laws violate companies’ free speech rights and cannot be enforced.